Alexei Ratmansky at The New Yorker Festival
October 5, 2008
On Saturday afternoon, The New Yorker Festival presented a discussion between dance critic Joan Acocella and Russian choreographer Alexei Ratmansky at Cedar Lake’s theater in Chelsea. Ratmansky is currently the Bolshoi Ballet’s artistic director, and he’s created works for several companies around the world, including his recent Concerto DSCH for New York City Ballet. He’s received a lot of attention over the past few weeks since signing a contract to join American Ballet Theatre as artist in residence in 2009, which I wrote about here.
The discussion covered a range of topics, including his struggles to introduce new works to the Bolshoi, the difference between Russian and American dance audiences, choreographing in the shadow of George Balanchine, and his decision to join ABT. The audience was also treated to some video excerpts from Ratmansky’s Middle Duet, Russian Seasons, and The Bolt. Unfortunately, Ms. Acocella was very forceful and dogmatic, while Mr. Ratmansky was soft-spoken and reserved – not the best combination of personalities for a discussion in which the audience was eager to hear more from him and less from her. However, he made some interesting points throughout the talk, which I’ll summarize below.
When asked to describe what it’s like to choreograph after the death of Mr. Balanchine, Ratmansky said that there is a clear divide for him between the Russian style and neoclassicism. Russian audiences appreciate and expect to see more story ballets (“They want to see the girl in a tutu”), which they believe are superior to the abstract, plot-less ballets for which Balanchine is known. But Ratmansky clearly values Balanchine’s style, stating that when Balanchine asked a dancer to lean off balance or turn in, “it was a revolution”.
Ms. Acocella asked Ratmansky why so many Bolshoi dancers have said nasty things about him. In an attempt to introduce new work to the Bolshoi, he brought in contemporary choreographers including Twyla Tharp and Christopher Wheeldon, even though most of the dancers were satisfied with performing the same repertoire. Ratmansky thought that Tharp’s In the Upper Room would speak to Russians, but as is the case with any ballet, some people will love it and some will hate it. Ultimately, Ratmansky felt that he had to make his own decisions about what to bring to the Bolshoi.
Regarding his decision to work with ABT and not with NYCB, Ratmansky simply explained that his contract at ABT provides him with enough free time to work with other companies, whereas he wouldn’t have had this flexibility at NYCB. It was also announced that his first ballet for ABT, premiering in June 2009, will be to a Prokofiev score. One of the most memorable things that Ratmansky said was, “Audiences want more emotional contact”, and that a dance company’s job is to establish “direct communication with the public”. Hopefully his contributions to ABT will meet these criteria.
New York City Ballet – Definitive Chopin
June 9, 2008
I’ll be the first to admit that I love Chopin’s piano pieces. They are breezy, thoughtful, and at times dramatic and intense. With such beautiful music, it is easy to let the mind wander (as mine did several times throughout the performance), to lose yourself in listening to the music, which is exactly what Jerome Robbins said in the program notes for his ballet The Concert. In fact, this was true for all of the pieces on Friday’s all-Robbins program.
Sara Mearns in Jerome Robbins’ Dances at a Gathering, photo by Paul Kolnik
When I saw Dances at a Gathering last summer, it was at Saratoga Performing Arts Center’s outdoor theater on a hot, humid night. The gathering on stage felt tangible, as if the ten dancers in this hour-long piece were dancing right on the lawn where some of the audience members sat. On Friday evening, sitting in the New York State Theater, the gathering was more distant, which I think had to do with the fact that it was performed indoors. The dancers, surely moved by Chopin’s music, drifted off to another place so that they were detached from the audience. Damian Woetzel was lost in thought as the ballet began, walking with his head in the sky and certainly daydreaming. Later, he was airborne in his solo, dancing effortlessly with clarity in his footwork and ease in his upper body. This role is undoubtedly one of his finest and most beloved. The rest of the cast was also strong in the series of solos, duets, and trios. Jared Angle’s elegant, confident partnering was particularly commendable. And Sara Mearns, as the girl in green, was superb. She accurately portrayed the aloofness and mysteriousness of her character as she wandered separately from the others.
Other Dances was so similar in mood and composition to Dances at a Gathering that it could have been part of that ballet. But there was only one couple – Julie Kent from American Ballet Theatre making a guest appearance, and Gonzalo Garcia – and a pianist on stage. The dark blue backdrop and blue-gray costumes lent a lazy, mellow feeling to the piece. The dancers graciously bowed as they exited and entered the stage for solos in between their pas de deux, but they were casual and a bit playful in their duet. Ms. Kent’s every gesture was delicate and serene, while Gonzalo Garcia had lovely lines and gracefully showed off his arms and long neck. Perhaps this ballet would stand out more if it were placed before or after pieces that offer more of a contrast. In its current position, it simply looks like a continuation of Dances at a Gathering, which is such a long ballet (sixty-three minutes, to be exact) that any piece following it should be dissimilar.
Gwyneth Muller and Andrew Veyette in Jerome Robbins’ The Concert, photo by John Ross
Fortunately, the evening ended with an altogether different piece. The Concert (or, The Perils of Everybody) is a comedy that illustrates an afternoon piano recital with a very recognizable cast of characters – all audience members of the concert. There were two gossipy women who made noise with their candy wrappers, a nerdy, bespectacled man, a young woman in love with music (she literally embraced the piano), and a henpecked husband, played by the hilarious Andrew Veyette. One of the funniest scenes from the ballet involved a corps of female dancers who couldn’t quite get it together to perform in perfect unison, no matter how hard they tried. One dancer was always turning the wrong way or waltzing in the opposite direction from the others. It was truly a choreographer’s worst nightmare. Chopin’s music was most memorable in the touching and realistic rain scene. Each character felt the first drops of rain, reluctantly opened his or her umbrella overhead, and then slowly continued walking about. It was a beautiful, poignant addition to the otherwise comical ballet.
A Busy Dance Calendar
May 27, 2008
There are a ton of upcoming performances and events that I’m really excited about. I’ll certainly try to post reviews of them all, but in the meantime, here’s a peek at some of the performances that I’ll be seeing over the next two weeks:
1) New York City Ballet’s “Here and Now”: This program includes a world premiere by Alexei Ratmansky (who was just featured in the NY Times Magazine), as well as Christopher Wheeldon’s Rococo Variations, Peter Martins’ River of Light, and Mauro Bigonzetti’s Oltremare. For tickets and dates, click here.
Sebastien Marcovici and Alexandra Ansanelli in River of Light, photo by Paul Kolnik
2) Armitage Gone! Dance: The Elegant Universe: The World Science Festival and Works & Process series at the Guggenheim are joining forces to present a new work by Karole Armitage that is inspired by The Elegant Universe, a book written by physicist Brian Greene. There will also be a discussion with Armitage, physicist Jim Gates, and composer Lukas Ligeti. I’m not really sure what to expect, but the combination of dance, music, physics, and string theory sounds so intriguing and intellectually stimulating that Allison and I couldn’t miss it. Click here for more information.
3) MOMIX‘s Lunar Sea: I’ll be returning to the Joyce to see Moses Pendleton’s company in Lunar Sea, “a psychedelic experiment in moon gravity.” Sounds pretty groovy, no? The company will perform Lunar Sea from May 27th through June 8th. Ticket info is here.
MOMIX in Lunar Sea
4) Cedar Lake Contemporary Ballet: The company’s spring season kicks off June 2nd with works by Jo Stromgren, Nicolo Fonte, and Angelin Preljocaj. Check out this cool video of Preljocaj’s L’Annonciation, and click here for ticket info.
5) American Ballet Theatre: From June 3rd through 7th, ABT will perform Rabbit and Rogue, a world premiere by Twyla Tharp with a commissioned score by Danny Elfman. Harald Lander’s Etudes is also on the program. Ticket information is here.
6) Gina Gibney Dance‘s 10 Years/1 Hour: On June 5th at 7:30 PM, the all-women company will present a short retrospective of works created within the last ten years, as part of NYU’s Tisch Summer Dance Residency Festival. The performance is at NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts. Tickets are $15. For more information, call 212-677-8560 or email info (at) ginagibneydance (dot) org.
Gina Gibney Dance in Unbounded, photo by ShaLeigh Comerford
It’s the New York City Dance Parade!
May 19, 2008
Marcelo Gomes and fellow ABT dancers watch the parade from 890 studios (click to enlarge)
The second annual New York City Dance Parade made its way down Broadway on Saturday, featuring 108 different dance organizations, including hip-hop dancers, salsa, flamenco, ballet, folkloric, and traditional ethnic dance companies. After parading down Broadway and through Union Square, all the dancers gathered at Tompkins Square Park for a 3-hour DanceFest. After watching the parade go past 890, I wandered through Tompkins Square Park to marvel at the complete craziness that ensued. It was great to see dance celebrated so enthusiastically, but also to see they myriad stilt walkers, dancers wrapped around poles with stretchy stuff, and of course, you couldn’t miss the the United States Dance Team, including Miss Dance U.S.A.
More pictures coming soon!







