Dance Films at the Rubin Museum

A still shot from Dream On Me, Nadine Helstroffer and Mark Taylor

Last Wednesday evening, two dance films by director John Bush and French-born choreographer Nadine Helstroffer premiered at the Rubin Museum of Art.  Absence Presence, a solo for Helstroffer commissioned by the museum and filmed on the gallery floor of the exhibit “Eternal Presence: Handprints and Footprints in Buddhist Art”, attempted to evoke spirituality and enlightenment through Tibetan paintings and spiraling, fluid movement.  The heavily edited film featured close-up shots of the artwork that frequently faded to show Helstroffer on the gallery floor.  Her otherworldly, slightly spacey expression and graceful presence were permanent fixtures in the film.  It would have been interesting, and perhaps more powerful, to view this work live, as a site-specific piece in the museum.  As a film, the dancer’s connection to the paintings and setting never fully came to fruition.

Dream On Me was even less successful.  The overly glossy work journeyed through a variety of outdoor locations in New York City that highlighted contrasts between human-made structures and natural environments.  A shifting ensemble of eight men and women danced on the rooftop of a building in midtown, on the shores of the Hudson, and through a snowy Central Park with The Gates art installation (2005) visible in the background.  More often than not, the film looked like an instructional yoga video.  The dancers dramatically posed on rocks in front of sparkling water, and at another point, three women frolicked around blossoming trees while wearing puffy pink dresses that were more appropriate for a three-year-old in a spring dance recital.  Dream On Me came across as corny and insincere.  The shift from one setting to the next was incoherent and meaningless.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in art, Dance, film, New York City, Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Dance Films at the Rubin Museum

  1. Charles Bernard says:

    It is hard to believe that the audience and I were at the same screening as this blogger. Everyone seemed to like it. The appreciation of the work was amply expressed during the Q&A, including high praise from the Museum’s founder who made a comparison to “A Midsummer Night’s Dream.”

    Dance film is neither dance nor film but something new altogether. Both films seemed to explore the more selfless emotions in ways that I had not seen dealt with before. Others in my party felt moved to tears by the intensity of the work and its personal and intimate allegories. The dance film for me seemed to follow certain Buddhist principles and was deliberately meditative in its exposition. This may have confused the blogger who seemed to not have the eyes to see.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s